I love this article, and why shouldn't I with a headline like this:
Reese trying again to be kingmaker-- Ha!

And quotes like these:
Reese's trademark hit pieces are back, too.
I think a lot of people thought Reese was dead meat . . . but he has amazing resilience.-- Sure do! Just ask the men of the Castro.
Reese did not return calls for this story.-- Yeah, like, why should I?
That prompted Reese's opponents to dismiss him as a washed-up political kingmaker. But Reese could prove them wrong.--Oh boy!
Despite claims in the last election of a Reese-free Richmond, the campaign is down and dirty like never before.-- Reese-free?
Over the years, Rogers has been endorsed and attacked by the Reese camp, and he lost every time Reese countered him.-- Ha!
Reese retains his power despite several setbacks.-- Yeah boy!
The mailer accusing Butt of ratting on Reese to the FBI... Why that dirty rat!
"I think it's unfortunate more people are not willing to stand up to him...I ignore Reese not because I can afford to. I'm not wealthy. I just don't care."-- He doesn't care? How sad. All I ever wanted was to be loved. Is that so wrong?